Effects of contralateral noise on envelope-following responses, auditory-nerve compound action potentials, and otoacoustic emissions measured simultaneously.

This study assessed whether the effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation (CAS) are consistent with eliciting the medial olivocochlear (MOC) reflex for measurements sensitive to outer hair cell (otoacoustic emissions, OAEs), auditory-nerve (AN; compound action potential, CAP), and brainstem/cortical (envelope-following response, EFR) function. The effects of CAS were evaluated for simultaneous measurement of OAEs, CAPs, and EFRs in participants with normal hearing. Clicks were presented at 40 or 98 Hz in three ipsilateral noise conditions (no noise, 45 dB SPL, and 55 dB SPL). For the no noise condition, CAS suppressed or enhanced EFR amplitudes for 40- and 98-Hz clicks, respectively, while CAS had no significant effect on CAP amplitudes. A follow-up experiment using slower rates (4.4-22.2 Hz) assessed whether this insignificant CAS effect on CAPs was from ipsilateral MOC stimulation or AN adaptation; however, CAS effects remained insignificant despite favorable signal-to-noise ratios. CAS-related enhancements of EFR and CAP amplitudes in ipsilateral noise were not observed, contrary to the anti-masking effect of the MOC reflex. EFR and OAE suppression from CAS were not significantly correlated. Thus, the effects of CAS on EFRs may not be solely mediated by the MOC reflex and may be partially mediated by higher auditory centers.

A Guinea Pig Model Suggests That Objective Assessment of Acoustic Hearing Preservation in Human Ears With Cochlear Implants Is Confounded by Shifts in the Spatial Origin of Acoustically Evoked Potential Measurements Along the Cochlear Length.

OBJECTIVES: Our recent empirical findings have shown that the auditory nerve compound action potential (CAP) evoked by a low-level tone burst originates from a narrow cochlear region tuned to the tone burst frequency. At moderate to high sound levels, the origins shift to the most sensitive audiometric regions rather than the extended high-frequency regions of the cochlear base. This means that measurements evoked from extended high-frequency sound stimuli can shift toward the apex with increasing level. Here we translate this study to understand the spatial origin of acoustically evoked responses from ears that receive cochlear implants, an emerging area of research and clinical practice that is not completely understood. An essential step is to first understand the influence of the cochlear implant in otherwise naive ears. Our objective was to understand how function of the high-frequency cochlear base, which can be excited by the intense low-frequency sounds that are frequently used for objective intra- and postoperative monitoring, can be influenced by the presence of the cochlear implant. DESIGN: We acoustically evoked responses and made measurements with an electrode placed near the guinea pig round window. The cochlear implant was not utilized for either electrical stimulation or recording purposes. With the cochlear implant in situ, CAPs were acoustically evoked from 2 to 16 kHz tone bursts of various levels while utilizing the slow perfusion of a kainic acid solution from the cochlear apex to the cochlear aqueduct in the base, which sequentially reduced neural responses from finely spaced cochlear frequency regions. This cochlear perfusion technique reveals the spatial origin of evoked potential measurements and provides insight on what influence the presence of an implant has on acoustical hearing. RESULTS: Threshold measurements at 3 to 11 kHz were elevated by implantation. In an individual ear, thresholds were elevated and lowered as cochlear implant was respectively inserted and removed, indicative of "conductive hearing loss" induced by the implant. The maximum threshold elevation occurred at most sensitive region of the naive guinea pig ear (33.66 dB at 8 kHz), making 11 kHz the most sensitive region to acoustic sounds for guinea pig ears with cochlear implants. Conversely, the acute implantation did not affect the low-frequency, 500 Hz thresholds and suprathreshold function, as shown by the auditory nerve overlapped waveform. As the sound pressure level of the tone bursts increased, mean data show that the spatial origin of CAPs along the cochlear length shifted toward the most sensitive cochlear region of implanted ears, not the extended high-frequency cochlear regions. However, data from individual ears showed that after implantation, measurements from moderate to high sound pressure levels originate in places that are unique to each ear. CONCLUSIONS: Alterations to function of the cochlear base from the in situ cochlear implant may influence objective measurements of implanted ears that are frequently made with intense low-frequency sound stimuli. Our results from guinea pigs advance the interpretation of measurements used to understand how and when residual acoustic hearing is lost in human ears receiving a cochlear implant.

Minimum Detectable Differences in Electrocochleography Measurements: Bayesian-Based Predictions.

Physiology of the cochlea and auditory nerve can be assessed with electrocochleography (ECochG), a technique that involves measuring auditory evoked potentials from an electrode placed near or within the cochlea. Research, clinical, and operating room applications of ECochG have in part centered on measuring the auditory nerve compound action potential (AP) amplitude, the summating potential (SP) amplitude, and the ratio of the two (SP/AP). Despite the common use of ECochG, the variability of repeated amplitude measurements for individuals and groups is not well understood. We analyzed ECochG measurements made with a tympanic membrane electrode in a group of younger normal-hearing participants to characterize the within-participant and group-level variability for the AP amplitude, SP amplitude, and SP/AP amplitude ratio. Results show that the measurements have substantial variability and that, especially with smaller sample sizes, significant reduction in variability can be obtained by averaging measurements across repeated electrode placements within subjects. Using a Bayesian-based model of the data, we generated simulated data to predict minimum detectable differences in AP and SP amplitudes for experiments with a given number of participants and repeated measurements. Our findings provide evidence-based recommendations for the design and sample size determination of future experiments using ECochG amplitude measurements, and the evaluation of previous publications in terms of sensitivity to detecting experimental effects on ECochG amplitude measurements. Accounting for the variability of ECochG measurements should result in more consistent results in the clinical and basic assessments of hearing and hearing loss, either hidden or overt.

Measurements From Ears With Endolymphatic Hydrops and 2-Hydroxypropyl-Beta-Cyclodextrin Provide Evidence That Loudness Recruitment Can Have a Cochlear Origin.

Background: Loudness recruitment is commonly experienced by patients with putative endolymphatic hydrops. Loudness recruitment is abnormal loudness growth with high-level sounds being perceived as having normal loudness even though hearing thresholds are elevated. The traditional interpretation of recruitment is that cochlear amplification has been reduced. Since the cochlear amplifier acts primarily at low sound levels, an ear with elevated thresholds from reduced cochlear amplification can have normal processing at high sound levels. In humans, recruitment can be studied using perceptual loudness but in animals physiological measurements are used. Recruitment in animal auditory-nerve responses has never been unequivocally demonstrated because the animals used had damage to sensory and neural cells, not solely a reduction of cochlear amplification. Investigators have thus looked for, and found, evidence of recruitment in the auditory central nervous system (CNS). While studies on CNS recruitment are informative, they cannot rule out the traditional interpretation of recruitment originating in the cochlea. Design: We used techniques that could assess hearing function throughout entire frequency- and dynamic-range of hearing. Measurements were made from two animal models: guinea-pig ears with endolymphatic-sac-ablation surgery to produce endolymphatic hydrops, and naïve guinea-pig ears with cochlear perfusions of 13 mM 2-Hydroxypropyl-Beta-Cyclodextrin (HPBCD) in artificial perilymph. Endolymphatic sac ablation caused low-frequency loss. Animals treated with HPBCD had hearing loss at all frequencies. None of these animals had loss of hair cells or synapses on auditory nerve fibers. Results: In ears with endolymphatic hydrops and those perfused with HPBCD, auditory-nerve based measurements at low frequencies showed recruitment compared to controls. Recruitment was not found at high frequencies (> 4 kHz) where hearing thresholds were normal in ears with endolymphatic hydrops and elevated in ears treated with HPBCD. Conclusions: We found compelling evidence of recruitment in auditory-nerve data. Such clear evidence has never been shown before. Our findings suggest that, in patients suspected of having endolymphatic hydrops, loudness recruitment may be a good indication that the associated low-frequency hearing loss originates from a reduction of cochlear amplification, and that measurements of recruitment could be used in differential diagnosis and treatment monitoring of Ménière's disease.

Reducing Auditory Nerve Excitability by Acute Antagonism of Ca2+-Permeable AMPA Receptors.

Hearing depends on glutamatergic synaptic transmission mediated by α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptors (AMPARs). AMPARs are tetramers, where inclusion of the GluA2 subunit reduces overall channel conductance and Ca2+ permeability. Cochlear afferent synapses between inner hair cells (IHCs) and auditory nerve fibers (ANFs) contain the AMPAR subunits GluA2, 3, and 4. However, the tetrameric complement of cochlear AMPAR subunits is not known. It was recently shown in mice that chronic intracochlear delivery of IEM-1460, an antagonist selective for GluA2-lacking AMPARs [also known as Ca2+-permeable AMPARs (CP-AMPARs)], before, during, and after acoustic overexposure prevented both the trauma to ANF synapses and the ensuing reduction of cochlear nerve activity in response to sound. Surprisingly, baseline measurements of cochlear function before exposure were unaffected by chronic intracochlear delivery of IEM-1460. This suggested that cochlear afferent synapses contain GluA2-lacking CP-AMPARs alongside GluA2-containing Ca2+-impermeable AMPA receptors (CI-AMPARs), and that the former can be antagonized for protection while the latter remain conductive. Here, we investigated hearing function in the guinea pig during acute local or systemic delivery of CP-AMPAR antagonists. Acute intracochlear delivery of IEM-1460 or systemic delivery of IEM-1460 or IEM-1925 reduced the amplitude of the ANF compound action potential (CAP) significantly, for all tone levels and frequencies, by > 50% without affecting CAP thresholds or distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE). Following systemic dosing, IEM-1460 levels in cochlear perilymph were ~ 30% of blood levels, on average, consistent with pharmacokinetic properties predicting permeation of the compounds into the brain and ear. Both compounds were metabolically stable with half-lives >5 h in vitro, and elimination half-lives in vivo of 118 min (IEM-1460) and 68 min (IEM-1925). Heart rate monitoring and off-target binding assays suggest an enhanced safety profile for IEM-1925 over IEM-1460. Compound potency on CAP reduction (IC50 ~ 73 µM IEM-1460) was consistent with a mixture of GluA2-lacking and GluA2-containing AMPARs. These data strongly imply that cochlear afferent synapses of the guinea pig contain GluA2-lacking CP-AMPARs. We propose these CP-AMPARs may be acutely antagonized with systemic dosing, to protect from glutamate excitotoxicity, while transmission at GluA2-containing AMPARs persists to mediate hearing during the protection.

Intracochlear Electrocochleography and Speech Perception Scores in Cochlear Implant Recipients.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Previous studies have demonstrated that electrocochleography (ECochG) measurements made at the round window prior to cochlear implant (CI) electrode insertion can account for 47% of the variability in 6-month speech perception scores. Recent advances have made it possible to use the apical CI electrode to record intracochlear responses to acoustic stimuli. Study objectives were to determine 1) the relationship between intracochlear ECochG response amplitudes and 6-month speech perception scores and 2) to determine the relationship between behavioral auditory thresholds and ECochG threshold estimates. The hypothesis was that intracochlear ECochG response amplitudes made immediately after electrode insertion would be larger than historical controls (at the extracochlear site) and explain more variability in speech perception scores. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective case series. METHODS: Twenty-two adult CI recipients with varying degrees of low-frequency hearing had intracochlear ECochG measurements made immediately after CI electrode insertion using 110 dB SPL tone bursts. Tone bursts were centered at five octave-spaced frequencies between 125 and 2,000 Hz. RESULTS: There was no association between intracochlear ECochG response amplitudes and speech perception scores. But, the data suggest a mild to moderate relationship between preoperative behavioral audiometric testing and intraoperative ECochG threshold estimates. CONCLUSION: Performing intracochlear ECochG is highly feasible and results in larger response amplitudes, but performing ECochG before, rather than after, CI insertion may provide a more accurate assessment of a patient's speech perception potential. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:E2681-E2688, 2021.

Medial olivocochlear reflex effects on amplitude growth functions of long- and short-latency components of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Functional outcomes of medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) activation, such as improved hearing in background noise and protection from noise damage, involve moderate to high sound levels. Previous noninvasive measurements of MOCR in humans focused primarily on otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) evoked at low sound levels. Interpreting MOCR effects on OAEs at higher levels is complicated by the possibility of the middle-ear muscle reflex and by components of OAEs arising from different locations along the length of the cochlear spiral. We overcame these issues by presenting click stimuli at a very slow rate and by time-frequency windowing the resulting click-evoked (CE)OAEs into short-latency (SL) and long-latency (LL) components. We characterized the effects of MOCR on CEOAE components using multiple measures to more comprehensively assess these effects throughout much of the dynamic range of hearing. These measures included CEOAE amplitude attenuation, equivalent input attenuation, phase, and slope of growth functions. Results show that MOCR effects are smaller on SL components than LL components, consistent with SL components being generated slightly basal of the characteristic frequency region. Amplitude attenuation measures showed the largest effects at the lowest stimulus levels, but slope change and equivalent input attenuation measures did not decrease at higher stimulus levels. These latter measures are less commonly reported and may provide insight into the variability in listening performance and noise susceptibility seen across individuals.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The auditory efferent system, operating at moderate to high sound levels, may improve hearing in background noise and provide protection from noise damage. We used otoacoustic emissions to measure these efferent effects across a wide range of sound levels and identified level-dependent and independent effects. Previous reports have focused on level-dependent measures. The level-independent effects identified here may provide new insights into the functional relevance of auditory efferent activity in humans.

Is cochlear synapse loss an origin of low-frequency hearing loss associated with endolymphatic hydrops?

There is a strong association between endolymphatic hydrops and low-frequency hearing loss, but the origin of the hearing loss remains unknown. A reduction in the number of cochlear afferent synapses between inner hair cells and auditory nerve fibres may be the origin of the low-frequency hearing loss, but this hypothesis has not been directly tested in humans or animals. In humans, measurements of hearing loss and postmortem temporal-bone based measurements of endolymphatic hydrops are generally separated by large amounts of time. In animals, there has not been a good objective, physiologic, and minimally invasive measurement of low-frequency hearing. We overcame this obstacle with the combined use of a reliable surgical approach to ablate the endolymphatic sac in guinea pigs and create endolymphatic hydrops, the Auditory Nerve Overlapped Waveform to measure low-frequency hearing loss (≤ 1 kHz), and immunohistofluorescence-based confocal microscopy to count cochlear synapses. Results showed low- and mid-(1-4 kHz) frequency hearing loss at all postoperative days, 1, 4, and 30. There was no statistically significant loss of cochlear synapses, and there was no correlation between synapse loss and hearing function. We conclude that cochlear afferent synaptic loss is not the origin of the low-frequency hearing loss in the early days following endolymphatic sac ablation. Understanding what is, and is not, the origin of a hearing loss can help guide preventative and therapeutic development.

A Revised Surgical Approach to Induce Endolymphatic Hydrops in the Guinea Pig.

Endolymphatic hydrops is an enlargement of scala media that is most often associated with Meniere's disease, though the pathophysiologic mechanism(s) remain unclear. In order to adequately study the attributes of endolymphatic hydrops, such as the origins of low-frequency hearing loss, a reliable model is needed. The guinea pig is a good model because it hears in the low-frequency regions that are putatively affected by endolymphatic hydrops. Previous research has demonstrated that endolymphatic hydrops can be induced surgically via intradural or extradural approaches that involve drilling on the endolymphatic duct and sac. However, whether it was possible to create an endolymphatic hydrops model using an extradural approach that avoided dangerous drilling on the endolymphatic duct and sac was unknown. The objective of this study was to demonstrate a revised extradural approach to induce experimental endolymphatic hydrops at 30 days post-operatively by obliterating the endolymphatic sac and injuring the endolymphatic duct with a fine pick. The sample size consisted of seven guinea pigs. Functional measurements of hearing were made and temporal bones were subsequently harvested for histologic analysis. The approach had a success rate of 86% in achieving endolymphatic hydrops. The risk of cerebrospinal fluid leak was minimal. No perioperative deaths or injuries to the posterior semicircular canal occurred in the sample. The presented method demonstrates a safe and reliable way to induce endolymphatic hydrops at a relatively quick time point of 30 days. The clinical implications are that the presented method provides a reliable model to further explore the origins of low-frequency hearing loss that can be associated endolymphatic hydrops.

The Spatial Origins of Cochlear Amplification Assessed by Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions.

Cochlear amplification of basilar membrane traveling waves is thought to occur between a tone's characteristic frequency (CF) place and within one octave basal of the CF. Evidence for this view comes only from the cochlear base. Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) provide a noninvasive alternative to direct measurements of cochlear motion that can be measured across a wide range of CF regions. Coherent reflection theory indicates that SFOAEs arise mostly from the peak region of the traveling wave, but several studies using far-basal suppressor tones claimed that SFOAE components originate many octaves basal of CF. We measured SFOAEs while perfusing guinea pig cochleas from apex to base with salicylate or KCl solutions that reduced outer-hair-cell function and SFOAE amplification. Solution effects on inner hair cells reduced auditory nerve compound action potentials (CAPs) and provided reference times for when solutions reached the SFOAE-frequency CF region. As solution flowed from apex to base, SFOAE reductions generally occurred later than CAP reductions and showed that the effects of cochlear amplification usually peaked ∼1/2 octave basal of the CF region. For tones ≥2 kHz, cochlear amplification typically extended ∼1.5 octaves basal of CF, and the data are consistent with coherent reflection theory. SFOAE amplification did not extend to the basal end of the cochlea, even though reticular lamina motion is amplified in this region, which indicates that reticular lamina motion is not directly coupled to basilar membrane traveling waves. Previous reports of SFOAE-frequency residuals produced by suppressor frequencies far above the SFOAE frequency are most likely due to additional sources created by the suppressor. For some tones <2 kHz, SFOAE amplification extended two octaves apical of CF, which highlights that different vibratory motions produce SFOAEs and CAPs, and that the amplification region depends on the cochlear mode of motion considered. The concept that there is a single "cochlear amplification region" needs to be revised.

Patients With Normal Hearing Thresholds but Difficulty Hearing in Noisy Environments: A Study on the Willingness to Try Auditory Training.

HYPOTHESIS: Persons with normal audiometric thresholds but excessive difficulty hearing in background noise will choose auditory training as a treatment option. BACKGROUND: Auditory training has traditionally been reserved for those with marked hearing loss. We investigated auditory training as a treatment option for those who have normal auditory thresholds but complain about hearing in noise-a population of patients for which no therapy or intervention currently exists. We also determined the willingness of this patient population to volunteer for a free auditory training program. METHODS: We administered a 14-item, telephone-based questionnaire to assess perceived difficulty hearing in noise and willingness to volunteer for auditory training. We developed questions to identify those who consistently reported difficulty hearing in noise, but not quiet. RESULTS: The 11,938-person database included 2,299 patients with pure-tone averages less than 25. A total of 474 of these patients completed our questionnaire, 135 of who had normal audiometric thresholds at all octave frequencies 0.25 to 8 kHz. We found that difficulty hearing in noise was a graded problem. Our approach to find consistent reports about hearing in noise showed that the majority of people who consistently had difficulty hearing in noise, but not quiet, were the most likely to try auditory training. CONCLUSIONS: While relatively few patients with both normal hearing thresholds and complaints of severe difficulty hearing in noise were in the database, these patients were generally willing to volunteer for auditory training. Our results provide evidence that many in this underserved population would volunteer for auditory training.

Human Summating Potential Using Continuous Loop Averaging Deconvolution: Response Amplitudes Vary with Tone Burst Repetition Rate and Duration.

Electrocochleography (ECochG) to high repetition rate tone bursts may have advantages over ECochG to clicks with standard slow rates. Tone burst stimuli presented at a high repetition rate may enhance summating potential (SP) measurements by reducing neural contributions resulting from neural adaptation to high stimulus repetition rates. To allow for the analysis of the complex ECochG responses to high rates, we deconvolved responses using the Continuous Loop Averaging Deconvolution (CLAD) technique. We examined the effect of high stimulus repetition rate and stimulus duration on SP amplitude measurements made with extratympanic ECochG to tone bursts in 20 adult females with normal hearing. We used 500 and 2,000 Hz tone bursts of various stimulus durations (12, 6, 3 ms) and repetition rates (five rates ranging from 7.1 to 234.38/s). A within-subject repeated measures (rate x duration) analysis of variance was conducted. We found that, for both 500 and 2,000 Hz stimuli, the mean deconvolved SP amplitudes were larger at faster repetition rates (58.59 and 97.66/s) compared to slower repetition rates (7.1 and 19.53/s), and larger at shorter stimulus duration compared longer stimulus duration. Our concluding hypothesis is that large SP amplitude to short duration stimuli may originate primarily from neural excitation, and large SP amplitudes to long duration, fast repetition rate stimuli may originate from hair cell responses. While the hair cell or neural origins of the SP to various stimulus parameters remains to be validated, our results nevertheless provide normative data as a step toward applying the CLAD technique to understanding diseased ears.

The Auditory Nerve Overlapped Waveform (ANOW) Detects Small Endolymphatic Manipulations That May Go Undetected by Conventional Measurements.

Electrocochleography (ECochG) has been used to assess Ménière's disease, a pathology associated with endolymphatic hydrops and low-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. However, the current ECochG techniques are limited for use at high-frequencies only (≥1 kHz) and cannot be used to assess and understand the low-frequency sensorineural hearing loss in ears with Ménière's disease. In the current study, we use a relatively new ECochG technique to make measurements that originate from afferent auditory nerve fibers in the apical half of the cochlear spiral to assess effects of endolymphatic hydrops in guinea pig ears. These measurements are made from the Auditory Nerve Overlapped Waveform (ANOW). Hydrops was induced with artificial endolymph injections, iontophoretically applied Ca2+ to endolymph, and exposure to 200 Hz tones. The manipulations used in this study were far smaller than those used in previous investigations on hydrops. In response to all hydropic manipulations, ANOW amplitude to moderate level stimuli was markedly reduced but conventional ECochG measurements of compound action potential thresholds were unaffected (i.e., a less than 2 dB threshold shift). Given the origin of the ANOW, changes in ANOW amplitude likely reflect acute volume disturbances accumulate in the distensible cochlear apex. These results suggest that the ANOW could be used to advance our ability to identify initial stages of dysfunction in ears with Ménière's disease before the pathology progresses to an extent that can be detected with conventional measures.

Efferent inhibition strength is a physiological correlate of hyperacusis in children with autism spectrum disorder.

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a developmental disability that is poorly understood. ASD can influence communication, social interaction, and behavior. Children with ASD often have sensory hypersensitivities, including auditory hypersensitivity (hyperacusis). In adults with hyperacusis who are otherwise neurotypical, the medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferent reflex is stronger than usual. In children with ASD, the MOC reflex has been measured, but without also assessing hyperacusis. We assessed the MOC reflex in children with ASD by measuring the strength of MOC-induced inhibition of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs), a noninvasive physiological measure that reflects cochlear amplification. MOC activity was evoked by contralateral noise. Hyperacusis was assessed subjectively on the basis of the children's symptoms. We found a significant correlation between hyperacusis scores and MOC strength in children with ASD. When children were divided into ASD-with-severe-hyperacusis (ASDs), ASD-with-not-severe-hyperacusis (ASDns), and neurotypical (NT) groups, the last two groups had similar hyperacusis and MOC reflexes, whereas the ASDs group, on average, had hyperacusis and MOC reflexes that were approximately twice as strong. The MOC inhibition of TEOAEs averaged larger at all frequencies in the ASDs compared with ASDns and NT groups. The results suggest that the MOC reflex can be used to estimate hyperacusis in children with ASD and might be used to validate future questionnaires to assess hyperacusis. Our results also provide evidence that strong MOC reflexes in children with ASD are associated with hyperacusis and that hyperacusis is a comorbid condition and is not a necessary, integral part of the abnormal neural processing associated with ASD.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are a heterogeneous group, some with hyperacusis and some without. Our research shows that hyperacusis can be estimated in children with ASD by using medial olivocochlear (MOC) reflex measurements. By establishing that an objective measure correlates with attributes of hyperacusis, our results enable future work to enable subtyping of children with ASD to provide improved individualized treatments to at-risk children and those without adequate language to describe their hyperacusis symptoms.

Contralateral Inhibition of Click- and Chirp-Evoked Human Compound Action Potentials.

Cochlear outer hair cells (OHC) receive direct efferent feedback from the caudal auditory brainstem via the medial olivocochlear (MOC) bundle. This circuit provides the neural substrate for the MOC reflex, which inhibits cochlear amplifier gain and is believed to play a role in listening in noise and protection from acoustic overexposure. The human MOC reflex has been studied extensively using otoacoustic emissions (OAE) paradigms; however, these measurements are insensitive to subsequent "downstream" efferent effects on the neural ensembles that mediate hearing. In this experiment, click- and chirp-evoked auditory nerve compound action potential (CAP) amplitudes were measured electrocochleographically from the human eardrum without and with MOC reflex activation elicited by contralateral broadband noise. We hypothesized that the chirp would be a more optimal stimulus for measuring neural MOC effects because it synchronizes excitation along the entire length of the basilar membrane and thus evokes a more robust CAP than a click at low to moderate stimulus levels. Chirps produced larger CAPs than clicks at all stimulus intensities (50-80 dB ppeSPL). MOC reflex inhibition of CAPs was larger for chirps than clicks at low stimulus levels when quantified both in terms of amplitude reduction and effective attenuation. Effective attenuation was larger for chirp- and click-evoked CAPs than for click-evoked OAEs measured from the same subjects. Our results suggest that the chirp is an optimal stimulus for evoking CAPs at low stimulus intensities and for assessing MOC reflex effects on the auditory nerve. Further, our work supports previous findings that MOC reflex effects at the level of the auditory nerve are underestimated by measures of OAE inhibition.

Assessment of low-frequency hearing with narrow-band chirp-evoked 40-Hz sinusoidal auditory steady-state response.

Objective To determine the clinical utility of narrow-band chirp-evoked 40-Hz sinusoidal auditory steady state responses (s-ASSR) in the assessment of low-frequency hearing in noisy participants. Design Tone bursts and narrow-band chirps were used to respectively evoke auditory brainstem responses (tb-ABR) and 40-Hz s-ASSR thresholds with the Kalman-weighted filtering technique and were compared to behavioral thresholds at 500, 2000, and 4000 Hz. A repeated measure ANOVA and post-hoc t-tests, and simple regression analyses were performed for each of the three stimulus frequencies. Study sample Thirty young adults aged 18-25 with normal hearing participated in this study. Results When 4000 equivalent response averages were used, the range of mean s-ASSR thresholds from 500, 2000, and 4000 Hz were 17-22 dB lower (better) than when 2000 averages were used. The range of mean tb-ABR thresholds were lower by 11-15 dB for 2000 and 4000 Hz when twice as many equivalent response averages were used, while mean tb-ABR thresholds for 500 Hz were indistinguishable regardless of additional response averaging. Conclusion Narrow-band chirp-evoked 40-Hz s-ASSR requires a ∼15 dB smaller correction factor than tb-ABR for estimating low-frequency auditory threshold in noisy participants when adequate response averaging is used.

Large endolymphatic potentials from low-frequency and infrasonic tones in the guinea pig.

Responses of the ear to low-frequency and infrasonic sounds have not been extensively studied. Understanding how the ear responds to low frequencies is increasingly important as environmental infrasounds are becoming more pervasive from sources such as wind turbines. This study shows endolymphatic potentials in the third cochlear turn from acoustic infrasound (5 Hz) are larger than from tones in the audible range (e.g., 50 and 500 Hz), in some cases with peak-to-peak amplitude greater than 20 mV. These large potentials were suppressed by higher-frequency tones and were rapidly abolished by perilymphatic injection of KCl at the cochlear apex, demonstrating their third-turn origins. Endolymphatic iso-potentials from 5 to 500 Hz were enhanced relative to perilymphatic potentials as frequency was lowered. Probe and infrasonic bias tones were used to study the origin of the enhanced potentials. Potentials were best explained as a saturating response summed with a sinusoidal voltage (Vo), that was phase delayed by an average of 60° relative to the biasing effects of the infrasound. Vo is thought to arise indirectly from hair cell activity, such as from strial potential changes caused by sustained current changes through the hair cells in each half cycle of the infrasound.

A new auditory threshold estimation technique for low frequencies: proof of concept.

OBJECTIVES: Presently available nonbehavioral methods to estimate auditory thresholds perform less well at frequencies below 1 kHz than at 1 kHz and above. For many uses, such as providing accurate infant hearing aid amplification for low-frequency vowels, an accurate nonbehavioral method to estimate low-frequency thresholds is needed. A novel technique was developed to estimate low-frequency cochlear thresholds based on the use of a previously reported waveform. It was determined how well the method worked by comparing the resulting thresholds to thresholds from onset-response compound action potentials (CAPs) and single-auditory-nerve (AN)- fibers in cats. A long-term goal is to translate this technique for use in humans. DESIGN: An electrode near the cochlea records a combination of cochlear microphonic (CM) and neural responses. In response to low-frequency, near threshold-level tones, the CM is almost sinusoidal whereas the neural responses occur preferentially at one phase of the tone. If the tone is presented again but with its polarity reversed, the neural response keeps the same shape, but shifts ½ cycle in time. Averaging responses to tones presented separately at opposite polarities overlaps and interleaves the neural responses and yields a waveform in which the CM is canceled and the neural response appears twice each tone cycle, that is, the resulting neural response is mostly at twice the tone frequency. The resultant waveform is referred to as "the auditory nerve overlapped waveform" (ANOW). In this study, ANOW level functions were measured in anesthetized cats from 10 to 80 dB SPL in 10 dB steps using tones between 0.3 and 1 kHz. As a response metric, the magnitude of the ANOW component was calculated at twice the tone frequency (ANOW2f). The ANOW threshold was the sound level where the interpolated ANOW2f crossed a statistical criterion that was higher than 95% of the noise floor distribution. ANOW thresholds were compared with onset-CAP thresholds from the same recordings and single-AN-fiber thresholds from the same animals. RESULTS: ANOW and onset-CAP level functions were obtained for 0.3 to 1 kHz tones, and single-AN-fiber responses from cats. Except at 1 kHz, typical ANOW thresholds were mostly 10 to 20 dB more sensitive than onset-CAP thresholds and 10 to 20 dB less sensitive than the most sensitive single-AN-fiber thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: ANOW provides frequency-specific estimates of cochlear neural thresholds over a frequency range that is important for hearing but is not well accessed by nonbehavioral, objective methods. Results suggest that with further targeted development, the ANOW low-frequency threshold estimation technique can be useful both clinically in humans and in basic-science animal experiments.

Effects of low-frequency biasing on otoacoustic and neural measures suggest that stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions originate near the peak region of the traveling wave.

Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) have been used to study a variety of topics in cochlear mechanics, although a current topic of debate is where in the cochlea these emissions are generated. One hypothesis is that SFOAE generation is predominately near the peak region of the traveling wave. An opposing hypothesis is that SFOAE generation near the peak region is deemphasized compared to generation in the tail region of the traveling wave. A comparison was made between the effect of low-frequency biasing on both SFOAEs and a physiologic measure that arises from the peak region of the traveling wave--the compound action potential (CAP). SFOAE biasing was measured as the amplitude of spectral sidebands from varying bias tone levels. CAP biasing was measured as the suppression of CAP amplitude from varying bias tone levels. Measures of biasing effects were made throughout the cochlea. Results from cats show that the level of bias tone needed for maximum SFOAE sidebands and for 50% CAP reduction increased as probe frequency increased. Results from guinea pigs show an irregular bias effect as a function of probe frequency. In both species, there was a strong and positive relationship between the bias level needed for maximum SFOAE sidebands and for 50% CAP suppression. This relationship is consistent with the hypothesis that the majority of SFOAE is generated near the peak region of the traveling wave.